Road Rage Reactions in Drivers Essay Example

Road Rage Reactions in Drivers Essay Example Road Rage Reactions in Drivers Paper Road Rage Reactions in Drivers Paper This experiment aimed to investigate road rage reactions in drivers. It used a 22 independent groups factorial design. The independent variables were vehicle status and participant gender. The dependent variables were the duration of any verbal road rage reactions made by participants, participants questionnaire scores on the Propensity to Angry Driving Scale and participants heart rates before and after the experiment. The main hypothesis is that duration of verbal road rage reactions will be affected as a result of participant gender and/or the status of the confederates vehicle. A 2-way ANOVA for independent groups was conducted to determine the effect of gender and vehicle status on the duration of ps road rage responses. Levenes test of equality of error variances was first carried out on the data, as this was not significant we can assume that the variances of the different conditions are similar and thus the subsequent ANOVA output may be used. The status main effect indicates that when the confederate drove a high status vehicle, males spent longer in their road rage reactions than when the confederate drove a low status vehicle. The differences for females depending on the status of the vehicle are shown only to be small. Overall the high status vehicle induces a longer duration of road rage. The gender main effect shows that females spend less time making verbal road rage reactions compared to males, when the vehicle was of high status; there was no major difference for low status vehicles. Interaction effects: represent the extent to which the dependent variable is influenced by the combined effect of two or more of the independent variables.

Based in and based out of

Based in and based out of Based in and based out of Based in and based out of By Maeve Maddox M. Arun writes: Is it correct to say I work out of New York- to mean that ones workplace is in New York. Or to say I am based out of New York to mean you live in New York? It sounds a wrong to me! The use of out of described here may be a regional thing. It is not standard English. Ordinarily, the expression to work out of a place is used this way: Mr. Patel works out of his house. Mr. Patel has a home office where he runs his business or fulfills the obligations of a job (telecommuting). George works out of New York. George lives in New York, or his companys office is in New York, but his work takes him to various places. As for based, a person or a business can be based in New York. To say that one is based out of New York seems to mean that the person or business is located somewhere other than in New York. It seems a curious choice for someone to say Im based out of New York to mean merely I live in New York. I suppose that the use of based in this context could represent an effort to distance oneself from the place lived in: Im based in New York for now, but my real home is in Alabama. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:75 Synonyms for â€Å"Angry†10 Types of TransitionsHyphenation in Compound Nouns